Demanding better, Jones provides a wise, measured look at the economic and social landscape of America.

HOW WE CAN WIN

RACE, HISTORY AND CHANGING THE MONEY GAME THAT'S RIGGED

A prominent Black activist and YA author delivers a damning, resounding study of the many ways in which fiscal equality is denied to non-White people in the U.S.

“We know we’re equal to white people,” writes Jones. “Only a person in the deepest throes of the white supremacist delusion would say we aren’t. But now we’re fighting for equity. And we won’t get to equity until we rethink the system from the ground up.” By way of a pointed, memorable example, she looks into the history of Monopoly, which, she holds, was designed to teach players not how to get rich but how the financial system is rigged in favor of would-be monopolists—and certainly against Black people, who are legally thwarted or beset with violence whenever it appears that they are making advances. Whites, Jones notes, hold 90% of all wealth in the U.S. even though they represent less than 60% of the population. One reason for this bounty is that home loans and other intergenerational wealth-building instruments, including college loans, were readily extended to Whites while being withheld from Blacks. Jones fires with both barrels, sometimes inaccurately: It’s true that Black popular culture has been appropriated without proper compensation, though not in the case of Elvis Presley’s hit “Hound Dog,” which she attributes to Big Mama Thornton when in fact it was written by Leiber & Stoller. Still, the author’s points are well taken: Black communities can close the wealth gap only with resources that pass from one generation to the next. Jones advises measures for a sort of Reconstruction 2.0 that would channel reparations to institutions and not individuals. “Structural issues are what brought us here,” she writes, “and so structural changes should walk us out of here.” The author also argues that self-improvement, from education to exercise to financial literacy, is “the most revolutionary thing you can do” for people within the Black community.”

Demanding better, Jones provides a wise, measured look at the economic and social landscape of America.

Pub Date: Jan. 18, 2022

ISBN: 978-1-250-80512-6

Page Count: 192

Publisher: Henry Holt

Review Posted Online: Nov. 10, 2021

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 1, 2021

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet

A scattershot exercise in preaching to the choir.

THE WAR ON THE WEST

A British journalist fulminates against Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and other threats to White privilege.

“There is an assault going on against everything to do with the Western world—its past, present, and future.” So writes Spectator associate editor Murray, whose previous books have sounded warnings against the presumed dangers of Islam and of non-Western immigration to the West. As the author argues, Westerners are supposed to take in refugees from Africa, Asia, and Latin America while being “expected to abolish themselves.” Murray soon arrives at a crux: “Historically the citizens of Europe and their offspring societies in the Americas and Australasia have been white,” he writes, while the present is bringing all sorts of people who aren’t White into the social contract. The author also takes on the well-worn subject of campus “wokeness,” a topic of considerable discussion by professors who question whether things have gone a bit too far; indeed, the campus is the locus for much of the anti-Western sentiment that Murray condemns. The author’s arguments against reparations for past damages inflicted by institutionalized slavery are particularly glib. “It comes down to people who look like the people to whom a wrong was done in history receiving money from people who look like the people who may have done the wrong,” he writes. “It is hard to imagine anything more likely to rip apart a society than attempting a wealth transfer based on this principle.” Murray does attempt to negotiate some divides reasonably, arguing against “exclusionary lines” and for Henry Louis Gates Jr.’s call for a more vigorous and welcoming civil culture. Too often, however, the author falters, as when he derides Gen. Mark Milley for saying, “I want to understand white rage. And I’m white”—perhaps forgetting the climacteric White rage that Milley monitored on January 6, 2021.

A scattershot exercise in preaching to the choir.

Pub Date: April 26, 2022

ISBN: 978-0-06-316202-0

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Broadside Books/HarperCollins

Review Posted Online: May 5, 2022

Did you like this book?

A deceptively slender but rich argument in favor of conserving liberal ideals—and liberal government.

LIBERALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS

The renowned political scientist and philosopher considers classical liberalism and the broad range of enemies arrayed against it.

“By ‘liberalism,’ ” writes Fukuyama, “I refer to the doctrine…that argued for the limitation of the powers of governments through law and ultimately constitutions, creating institutions protecting the rights of individuals living under their jurisdiction.” Born of events such as the English civil war and the Enlightenment, this liberalism also encouraged diversity of thought, religion, and ethnicity, placing it squarely in the crosshairs of today’s authoritarian nationalists, not least Donald Trump. Fukuyama has often been identified with conservative causes, but his thinking here is democratic to the core, and he has no use for such pathetic lies as Trump’s insistence that the 2020 election was stolen. That said, the author notes that liberalism has many enemies on both the left and the right for numerous real yet correctable failings. The neoliberalism that has emerged over the past couple of generations has accelerated inequality, and numerous institutions have been eroded while others, such as the Electoral College, have been revealed to be anti-democratic. Both left and right, the author argues, have trouble accepting that governing over diversity, the hallmark of liberalism, means governing over many ethnic and national groups, strata of income, and competing interests. He adds, however, “Left-of-center voters…remain much more diverse” in political outlook. Essential to a liberal society, Fukuyama insists, is the right to vote: “Voting rights are fundamental rights that need to be defended by the power of the national government.” While he insists that individual rights take precedence over group rights, he also observes that the social contract demands citizen participation. To the conservative charge that the social contract is one thing but the “common moral horizon” another, he answers that yes, liberalism does not insist on a single morality—which “is indeed a feature and not a bug.”

A deceptively slender but rich argument in favor of conserving liberal ideals—and liberal government.

Pub Date: May 10, 2022

ISBN: 978-0-374-60671-8

Page Count: 192

Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2022

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2022

Did you like this book?

No Comments Yet
more